ERCAST
The list of potential badness in the pregnant patient with right lower quadrant pain is long and distinguished, but it often comes down to a simple question…
“Does this patient have appendicitis?”
Subtext: “Is this patient going to need a CT scan?”
Nobody likes ordering am abdominal CT on a pregnant patient because, no matter how low the statistical risk of damage to the fetus, there is still potential harm from ionizing radiation.
Listen to this podcast to discover that the risk of immediate maternal and fetal harm is far greater than the long term risk of ionizing radiation exposure.
Interview with Ingrid Lim MD at ACEP 2011
Risk of mortality with appendicitis in pregnancy:
In a pregnant patient with unperforated appendicitis, fetal loss is 3-5%. With perforation, fetal loss skyrockets: -30% in trimesters 1 and 2 -70% in trimester 3
Maternal mortality is 1% without perforation and 4% with perforation
Diagnosis:
- Step 1: Ultrasound- more sensitive in the 1st vs. 3rd trimester. Even though it may be inconclusive as far as appendicitis, ultrasound can give valuable information about the fetus, uterus, ovaries, kidneys and gallbladder. If ultrasound doesn’t give the answer….
- Step 2: MRI without contrast DO NOT USE GADOLINIUM:CONTRAINDICATED IN PREGNANCY If no MRI available…
- Step 3: CT with or without contrast depends on your local radiologist. Contrast (IV or PO) is considered safe in pregnancy. Research has shown that contrast does not harm fetal thyroid
RADIATION PRIMER for CT Appy protocol
- Fetal background radiation exposure during 9 months of pregnancy 0.1 rad (1mGy) Teratogenesis threshold: 5 rad (50mGy)
- Estimated fetal radiation exposure from CT Appy protocol:
- Trimester 1: 2.4 rad (24mGy)
- Trimesters 2 and 3: 3 rad (30mGy)
Teratogenesis:
- Fetal death, malformation or developmental delay from in utero radiation exposure.
- The threshold for a <1% teratogenesis risk is 5 rad (50mGy).
- The highest risk period is 3-15 weeks.
- The amount of radiation absorbed from a CT appy protocol is less than the 5 rad teratogenic threshold.
- Even with exposure to 10 rads, there is a 99% chance of no fetal teratogenic effects.
Carcinogenesis:
- Most worrisome for childhood cancers such as leukaemia.
- The baseline risk of dying from childhood cancer is 1 in 2000.
- A 5 rad exposure is believed to increase that risk to 2 in 2000.
- While that is a doubling of the relative risk, it is still small compared the rate of fetal loss from a ruptured appendix.
Bonus section: Ectopic Pregnancy and HCG levels
Traditional teaching holds that if the HCG does not double in the first 48 hours, consider ectopic. But many patients do not follow this curve. With the development of more sensitive assays, a minimum rise of 53% over 48 hrs is acceptable. 3% of ectopic pregnancies can have a negative serum HCG
Two theories:
- Have to have a viable trophoblast to produce HCG, no trophoblast…no HCG
- Ectopic died then ruptured
Bottom line.. if patient looks sick and there is a lot of free fluid in the pelvis – go to surgery
Written Summary: Justin Arambasick MD (Akron General Medical Center) and Rob Orman MD (ERCAST.org)
Additional Resources
- Direct Download of RLQ in pregnancy
- A good article on MRI uses in pregnancy
- The Disposable Film Festival
- ERCAST on iTunes
- Research and Review in the FastLane: amazing project thatbrings together physicians from across the globe to find the hottest medical articles on the planet. This is an international collaboration with contributers from Ireland, UK, South Africa, Australia and the United States. If you want to see what’s making waves in the medical world and stay up to date on current trends in emergency medicine and critical care
Hi Rob, Casey here again with my routine difficult question…
Has anybody looked at he risk of CT vs. a quick GA / exploratory laparoscopy (or mini laparotomy). We go GAs on pregnant women a lot with not too much downside.
Is this crazy, or too simple ? Casey
Casey, I think your idea is spot on, but in the US, it’s rare to find a surgeon who will operate on a pregnant patient without a confirmed diagnosis unless she is in extremis. I could find no recent RCTs on the exploratory laparoscopy in this scenario. Keep fighting the good fight, brother.